Print Page - Table of all the Benchmarks

Title: Table of all the Benchmarks - 27/01/2011
Post by: Pau1 on January 27, 2011, 04:13:34 AM

There's not much love for AMD!

If anyone has updated info then please let me know.
I'll try and keep it updated reasonably often!

Updated 1st March 2011

Title: Re: Table of all the Benchmarks - 27/01/2011
Post by: Robert V. on January 27, 2011, 05:02:53 AM

nice work! are you planning of keeping this updated?

Title: Re: Table of all the Benchmarks - 27/01/2011
Post by: Chad Holton on January 27, 2011, 06:25:44 AM

It's nice to see them all at the same time. Thanks for putting that together.
I was an AMD fan... until I bought an i7.

Title: Re: Table of all the Benchmarks - 27/01/2011
Post by: Pau1 on January 27, 2011, 07:01:47 AM

Cheers guys, I was bored this morning and this is the result ;)

I'll benchmark my AMD system at home tonight and (hopefully) give a few Xeons a run for their money. I'll be getting a 6 core soonish.

I'll try and keep the list updated but don't expect it to be done daily.

Have you benchmarked your i7 cholton?

Title: Re: Table of all the Benchmarks - 27/01/2011
Post by: Chad Holton on January 27, 2011, 12:12:42 PM

Those hex cores are nice - I built a PC for a friend who wanted one. Looking back, I wish I ran the benchmark on it before giving it back.

I have the i7 920 and was getting anywhere between 47-52 @ 2.66 GHz and up to 57 (OC'd @ 3.5 GHz). Pretty much the same as what other people had posted, so I didn't bother posting.

Title: Re: Table of all the Benchmarks - 27/01/2011
Post by: JeffM on January 27, 2011, 06:46:11 PM

We have a few machines to add to the list. I'll get them benchmarked soon.

One is a dual socket hexcore AMD machine. It'll be interesting to see it's result vs our Intel dual westmere systems.

Title: Re: Table of all the Benchmarks - 27/01/2011
Post by: Speedster on January 28, 2011, 04:16:44 PM

The "speedster" entry is incorrect- it's a new upgrade to Win 7 x 64 bit, with 16 GB. Also, the fpsI reported is really wierd- see my updated post today. I wish I had pulled a screenshot back then. I have not tweaked, moved or anything the camera bip since the upgrade.
Bill G

Title: Re: Table of all the Benchmarks - 27/01/2011
Post by: jlowap on February 23, 2011, 12:49:55 AM

added new PC:-

42 FPS
Dell T3500 Xeon W3530 HT 2.8Ghz, 6GB, Quadro 4000

http://keyshot.com/forum/index.php?topic=1601.0

Title: Re: Table of all the Benchmarks - 27/01/2011
Post by: Pau1 on March 01, 2011, 03:07:14 AM

This has been updated for Feb's results.

Title: Re: Table of all the Benchmarks - 27/01/2011
Post by: PhilippeV8 on March 16, 2011, 06:05:51 AM

Am I realy the only one on an AMD ??

Title: Re: Table of all the Benchmarks - 27/01/2011
Post by: trice1 on March 21, 2011, 02:21:37 PM

No, you are not. At least I'm not on the bottom of the list, but close.
HP
32bit Dual Core
Athlon 3800+ 2Ghz.
3gb. ram
8.4 fps on test.
41650 triangles.

Title: Re: Table of all the Benchmarks - 27/01/2011
Post by: PhilippeV8 on February 08, 2012, 12:18:45 AM

bump

Title: Re: Table of all the Benchmarks - 27/01/2011
Post by: jiyang1018 on October 25, 2012, 12:24:45 AM

Feel the table should include keyshot version number.
I feel it is a important factor affecting fps.

Mine is 84, sometimes 84.6, sometimes 83.x.
http://keyshot.com/forum/index.php/topic,4719.0.html

Title: Re: Table of all the Benchmarks - 27/01/2011
Post by: PhilippeV8 on October 25, 2012, 04:13:24 AM

jiyang1018 > sure it does need version number ... but if you check the post date of this table image and compare it to the release date of KS3 ............. ;)

KeyShot Forum

Other => Benchmark => Topic started by: Pau1 on January 27, 2011, 04:13:34 AM