CPU Specs vs Keyshot Performance Estimation

[joseph]

FX8370
KeyShot 6.2
55.6 FPS
4.0 GHz
8 cores x 4.0 = 32
55.6 FPS / 32 = 1.7375

[Josh3D]

Ready to update.

[joseph]

Its time for 2018 generation hardware 

Current:
Ryzen7 1700x standard bios auto settings 3.492 GHz
8C / 16T
32 GB DDR4 at 2933 Mhz
W10 1803
KeyShot 7.3.40
154.0 FPS

16 x 3.492 = 55.872
154 / 55.872 = 2.756 performance ratio

$340 CPU / 16 = $21.25 per core

[jiyang1018]

i9-7940X @ 3.5GHz, windows 10 shows 3.47GHz, but HWMonitor shows 3.505GHz
14 core, 28 thread
Keyshot 7.3
253fps
This concludes a performance ratio of 2.68
All AMD 1950x are 2.36-2.48. It is safe to predict that every Intel i9 clock/core has about 10% more performance comparing to AMD threadripper.
However, based on joseph's testing, Ryzen 7 1700x, @2.756 performance ratio, is about 3% performance gain over i9.
Considering i9-7940X is still 1150USD, according to pcpartpicker, or 999USD from microcenter, Threadripper 1950X is only 699USD. If you can get MB for each platform at about the same price, 1950X is a much better option for performance/dollar and just raw performance.

[joseph]

I just built another pc for remote site work. It is a Ryzen 7 2700 with 16 GB DDR4 3000 Mhz (2933 Mhz for Ryzen 2700),  AMD Radeon Pro WX3100. Got the CPU for AUD389.00 (about USD289.00). 144.1 FPS at default settings 3.268 Mhz all core boost.
16 x 3.268 = 52.28
144.1 FPS / 52.28 = 2.756 performance ratio
$289 / 16 cores = $18.06 per core

Performance ratio seems to be the same as the 1700x with 10 fps more  Or the Current Ryzen architecture just have a 2.756 average performance ratio across the 8C / 16 models.